<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Poissonian traffic models matter more now than ever, part 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.eqnets.com/2009/07/21/why-poissonian-traffic-models-matter-more-now-than-ever-part-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.eqnets.com/2009/07/21/why-poissonian-traffic-models-matter-more-now-than-ever-part-3/</link>
	<description>Science, networks, and security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 22:01:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RZ</title>
		<link>http://blog.eqnets.com/2009/07/21/why-poissonian-traffic-models-matter-more-now-than-ever-part-3/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>RZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 14:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eqnets.com/?p=126#comment-137</guid>
		<description>Just discovered you blog, I am busy reading it causally ( from first entry). 

I have only a vague recollection of the &quot;IP traffic is fractal&quot; rage, but I don&#039;t think anybody thought that packet inter-arrivals had long tails, especially not for multiplexed traffic. There is a kind of &quot;central-limit theorem&quot;  that says that if you have a bunch of overlapping point processes the interarrivals look exponential.  

The real question is not whether the microscopic behavior is locally Poissonian, but how do the statistics of the &quot;macroscopic&quot; traffic rate behave. Even physical fractals have atoms at the bottom.

PS- a preview option would be nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just discovered you blog, I am busy reading it causally ( from first entry). </p>
<p>I have only a vague recollection of the &#8220;IP traffic is fractal&#8221; rage, but I don&#8217;t think anybody thought that packet inter-arrivals had long tails, especially not for multiplexed traffic. There is a kind of &#8220;central-limit theorem&#8221;  that says that if you have a bunch of overlapping point processes the interarrivals look exponential.  </p>
<p>The real question is not whether the microscopic behavior is locally Poissonian, but how do the statistics of the &#8220;macroscopic&#8221; traffic rate behave. Even physical fractals have atoms at the bottom.</p>
<p>PS- a preview option would be nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
