“Trying to assign attribution is what real professionals do. They think in terms of threats, not vulnerabilities”
(see also Threats versus capabilities)
“Apptis…repaid $1.3 million of a $5.4 million Pentagon contract after investigators said the company provided inadequate computer security and a subcontractor’s system was hacked from an Internet address in China”
4chan responds to AT&T
This entry was posted on Tuesday, July 28th, 2009 at 14:36 and is filed under Communications security, Networks, Random bits. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:
Please log in to WordPress.com to post a comment to your blog.
You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )
Connecting to %s
Notify me of follow-up comments via email.
Why Poissonian traffic models matter more now than ever, part 1 2 3 4 5 6
Common data sets and the illusion of scientific security testing
A minimal periodic coloring theorem part 1 2 3
Dynamical bias in the dice roll
The fundamental law of statistical physics
Jaynes and the Gibbs paradox
A graded lexicographic index, part 1 2 3
Solution of second-order matrix difference equations
Birds on a wire and the Ising model
The chimera of cyberdeterrence
Martingales from finite Markov processes, part 1
Initial software release
[All Equilibrium-related posts]
[All commentary]
[Nonrandom bits]
Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.
