Random bits

2 Responses to “Random bits”

  1. rjlipton says:

    Cute but spurious. I just wrote a few dense posts with lost of cool new math. So was time to have some fun.

  2. eqnets says:

    FWIW one of the more interesting things I recall seeing in recent memory attempting to link theoretical physics and complexity classes was using the renormalization group to look at P vs NP: see http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0608053

Leave a Reply