<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Random bits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.eqnets.com/2009/07/31/random-bits-15/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.eqnets.com/2009/07/31/random-bits-15/</link>
	<description>Science, networks, and security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 18:48:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: eqnets</title>
		<link>http://blog.eqnets.com/2009/07/31/random-bits-15/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eqnets]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 04:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eqnets.com/?p=186#comment-4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FWIW one of the more interesting things I recall seeing in recent memory attempting to link theoretical physics and complexity classes was using the renormalization group to look at P vs NP: see http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0608053]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FWIW one of the more interesting things I recall seeing in recent memory attempting to link theoretical physics and complexity classes was using the renormalization group to look at P vs NP: see <a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0608053" rel="nofollow">http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0608053</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rjlipton</title>
		<link>http://blog.eqnets.com/2009/07/31/random-bits-15/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rjlipton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 04:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eqnets.com/?p=186#comment-3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cute but spurious. I just wrote a few dense posts with lost of cool new math. So was time to have some fun.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cute but spurious. I just wrote a few dense posts with lost of cool new math. So was time to have some fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

