<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dynamical Bias in the Dice Roll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.eqnets.com/2009/08/24/dynamical-bias-in-the-dice-roll/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.eqnets.com/2009/08/24/dynamical-bias-in-the-dice-roll/</link>
	<description>Science, networks, and security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 18:48:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: eqnets</title>
		<link>http://blog.eqnets.com/2009/08/24/dynamical-bias-in-the-dice-roll/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eqnets]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 22:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eqnets.com/?p=422#comment-215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;It is shown and emphasized that, from the dynamical point of view, outcomes are predictable, i.e. if an experienced player can reproduce initial conditions with a small finite uncertainty, there is a good chance that the desired final state will be obtained.&quot; See http://books.google.com/books?id=kf-OOB7EMyYC]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It is shown and emphasized that, from the dynamical point of view, outcomes are predictable, i.e. if an experienced player can reproduce initial conditions with a small finite uncertainty, there is a good chance that the desired final state will be obtained.&#8221; See <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=kf-OOB7EMyYC" rel="nofollow">http://books.google.com/books?id=kf-OOB7EMyYC</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eqnets</title>
		<link>http://blog.eqnets.com/2009/08/24/dynamical-bias-in-the-dice-roll/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eqnets]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eqnets.com/?p=422#comment-22</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seems like it. But as long as the paint density doesn&#039;t match the body density then these arguments still apply...it&#039;s just a difference of the degree of bias]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like it. But as long as the paint density doesn&#8217;t match the body density then these arguments still apply&#8230;it&#8217;s just a difference of the degree of bias</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.eqnets.com/2009/08/24/dynamical-bias-in-the-dice-roll/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eqnets.com/?p=422#comment-21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... &quot;pip densities are sufficiently carefully controlled&quot;... 

don&#039;t most die have painted dots nowadays?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; &#8220;pip densities are sufficiently carefully controlled&#8221;&#8230; </p>
<p>don&#8217;t most die have painted dots nowadays?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eqnets</title>
		<link>http://blog.eqnets.com/2009/08/24/dynamical-bias-in-the-dice-roll/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eqnets]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 01:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eqnets.com/?p=422#comment-19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also of interest regarding moments of inertia and principal axes for dice:

http://maths.dur.ac.uk/~dma0cvj/mathphys/supplements/supplement2/supplement2.html

and note that any three orthogonal axes are principal axes for a cube, but for a die it&#039;s not clear that the principal axes aren&#039;t substantially different from the x-, y- and z- axes. But it seems likely that they are close to them: see, e.g.

http://skepticsplay.blogspot.com/2008/07/home-experiment-spinning-box.html

The key ideas of this post hold either way, though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also of interest regarding moments of inertia and principal axes for dice:</p>
<p><a href="http://maths.dur.ac.uk/~dma0cvj/mathphys/supplements/supplement2/supplement2.html" rel="nofollow">http://maths.dur.ac.uk/~dma0cvj/mathphys/supplements/supplement2/supplement2.html</a></p>
<p>and note that any three orthogonal axes are principal axes for a cube, but for a die it&#8217;s not clear that the principal axes aren&#8217;t substantially different from the x-, y- and z- axes. But it seems likely that they are close to them: see, e.g.</p>
<p><a href="http://skepticsplay.blogspot.com/2008/07/home-experiment-spinning-box.html" rel="nofollow">http://skepticsplay.blogspot.com/2008/07/home-experiment-spinning-box.html</a></p>
<p>The key ideas of this post hold either way, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

