This is actually something I have been developing strategy wise for a while. I specialize in highly distruptive cyberwar strategy that can be leveraged against aggressors, nation states and advanced cybercrime cabals. For example. How much would it be worth to Fortune 100 to get a name, number, picture, and address where you could literally reach out and TOUCH an operator who is directly responsible for stealing your companies highly prized intellectual capital. I have proposed an Attribution Market as one means of Bringing those who thrive in darkness into the light. It would serve as a highly disruptive catalyst to enemy operations and Nation state sensitivies (Goverments do not like bad attention, Crime Bosses dont like getting to HOT, esp when you put a name to a face. Dont believe for a Second we dont know who is behind the drain in US innovation these past 10 years. If Hillary cant make a determined adversary change their ways, maybe a more direct approach is needed. Obviously Bush/Obama have not made an impact. Has your APT pressure abated. I think not. Never forget they are not nameless/faceless theories/whispers in the dark. They are real Flesh Blood humans who are tasked by official organizations to conduct highly hostile and own your networks, pillage the best you have, and leave your organization open for destruction or redirection in an attack or as a proxy for future efforts. If you want more on my theories check my blog out.
http://diocyde.wordpress.com

-”How much would you pay to look into your adversaries eyes and touch a pressure point?”

Something to think about.