<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Clinton doctrine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.eqnets.com/2010/01/25/the-clinton-doctrine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.eqnets.com/2010/01/25/the-clinton-doctrine/</link>
	<description>Science, networks, and security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 18:48:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Ventre</title>
		<link>http://blog.eqnets.com/2010/01/25/the-clinton-doctrine/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Ventre]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 08:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eqnets.com/?p=1087#comment-208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is no &quot;Clinton Doctrine&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no &#8220;Clinton Doctrine&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.eqnets.com/2010/01/25/the-clinton-doctrine/#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eqnets.com/?p=1087#comment-183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fine but where&#039;s the &#039;doctrine&#039;?  I didn&#039;t see any threat or guidance in her statements, to me it just sounds like she&#039;s on the sideline bitching about it.  And to think that her comments were coordinated with anybody is just naive (see decision to try flight 253 bomber as civilian).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fine but where&#8217;s the &#8216;doctrine&#8217;?  I didn&#8217;t see any threat or guidance in her statements, to me it just sounds like she&#8217;s on the sideline bitching about it.  And to think that her comments were coordinated with anybody is just naive (see decision to try flight 253 bomber as civilian).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

